Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew
...show some kind of facts that counter the lies.

Like what, exactly? Negative proofs are famously hard to come by. She says that they were alone, no one else to confirm or deny her story. So, the setup is this: who do you believe? It's the classic he said/she said. No way to affirmatively prove, or disprove.

86 posted on 11/07/2011 6:03:35 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You can never do more, you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: absalom01

At best, she tells a bizarre story.


93 posted on 11/07/2011 6:11:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: absalom01
The accuser is always the one obliged to get down to exact who, what, where, when, etc. and somewhere in there will be a fabrication he should be able to blow a hole through (probably a few holes at least).

Until this accuser does so, Cain can simply say the same thing: she's obligated to put up or shut up and in the meantime, until she does so, his reply to the media should be, "Don't waste my time and the American people's time with such filth and distraction."

Cain needs to challenge this accuser this way instead of ignoring it or knee-jerk blaming the media.

94 posted on 11/07/2011 6:12:59 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson