Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JesseWatters
First you complained that the original Politico article didn't have a face behind the story, that it was anonymous and not credible for that reason. You now have a name and a face to accompany those charges.

You complained that the original article wasn't credible because it lacked any specifics--well now you have specifics.

You have the wife of a pediatrician who is willing to put herself forward as the face of all of these allegations with no monetary demands, only the demand for Cain to tell the truth. She is public and she is specific and all you can do is make personal attacks on how she looks and behaves.

You are doing to her exactly what you attacked the Clinton people for doing.

We don't know whether she is telling the truth or not, but you aren't even willing to entertain the possibility of her doing so. This is the sort of reaction I would have expected at DU or dKos, but I would never have expected a bunch of so called conservatives of behaving like this.

I suggest you all take a good look in the mirror and see if you like what you see. Hatred is ugly and people who are so emotionally attached to a candidate that they can't entertain any possibility of their not being as they appear are pathetic.
53 posted on 11/07/2011 3:26:09 PM PST by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sudetenland

What specifics? At least, what verifiable specifics?


58 posted on 11/07/2011 4:21:05 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson