Even if it’s true, that he hit on her,,,,apparently he got shot down and stopped when asked. So even IF i believed the psycho,,,, i’d still support him.
Now we can’t vote for a guy thats ever tried to get some from a chick who clearly made herself available?
Herman Cain was married when this supposedly happened.
It makes a difference. Cain gave up the choice to “get some from a chick” other than his wife when the rings went on their fingers.
Granted, I can imagine situations where I would support admitted and confessed adulterers (Newt Gingrich, for example) if the other options are worse. But if we can't trust a guy not to cheat on his wife, what **CAN** we trust him to do?
It took a long time for the Republicans to become the party of family values. We can't become the party of Bill Clinton-lite. I'm not saying Cain did this, but what I **AM** saying is that we need to deal with the accusations differently from how the Democrats handled Clinton.