That’s less a cheap feel up and more an attempted fingerblast. Or so the young people tell ne.
Excellent point, but don't you see, that is just one more proof of how carefully crafted this lie is: can't have any of the action taking place in the hotel because she has to avoid any appearance that she was the one making the play or that she would clearly have understood why she was in a hotel room with someone else's husband after a fine dinner. See, if it's Herman's room, everyone can say "well, you knew exactly why he asked and you agreed to go to the room". If it's her room, everyone can say, "you must have invited him there and, if you did, you gave the clear impression that you expected a sexual liaison. In hotel rooms, you have to explain a lot of details about how a man gets so close to you that he can reach up your skirt or pull your head down, without your having allowed him to get into your personal space. In a car, the dynamic is completely different: There is no suggestion that you put yourself in a situation likely to lead to a sexual encounter, there is no suggestion that you arranged the circumstances to provoke a sexual situation and you can explain away in a perfectly plausible manner how the man got close enough to be able to make physical contact in a sexually explicit manner. It's all too perfect. That's what's really wrong with this story: it's so airtight in terms of no possibility of witnesses, no suggestion that she actually made the play, etc. Just too damn perfect to be believed. But in th