Not only has there been a shameful rush to ‘blame the women’ in this affair, but some people are using the same lines and lies that were told about the Clinton victim.
Anybody see the irony in that?
So far there are no “the women” here they settled years ago and are anonymous.
Itb is perfectly appropriate to condemn these women for hurling accusation while hiding behind a shield of anonymity.
In Clinton’s case ALL the women stepped forward and identified themselves.
It is perfectly appropriate to condemn these women for hurling accusation while hiding behind a shield of anonymity.
In Clinton’s case ALL the women stepped forward and identified themselves.
But blaming Cain with no evidence that he did anything wrong is JUST FINE, right?
The only reason the women are being blamed is because they make allegations through an attorney and friend of John Podesta, yet refuse to talk about it themselves.
The NRA has given them the clearance to speak out.
If we are supposed to believe them, they would have to come out and tell their story and submit themselves to scrutiny.
If they don’t do that, it has to be considered “not much”.
Nope. Clinton's victims came forward and stated clearly what he did. The women accusing Cain have not come forward nor stated what he did, even when their non-disclosure agreement was waived. At this late date, anyone making an additional allegation will be under intense scrutiny, as it should be.
Hope you don't get what you wish for - because if Perry ever gets in the lead Gloria Alred is going to be able to pick and choose her clients from Perry “accusers”.
If these types of comments weren’t satire and sarcasm, I would agree with you.
Anyone see the irony in you spreading this kind of liberal slime while pretending you are not in the gutter?
Seriously, do us all a favor and quit pretending you have a lick of principles, and are just out to bash Cain to try in your misguided way to promote Perry.
I would defend Perry or Newt or any other conservative from this kind of liberal hatchet job.
The fact that you are picking up the hatchet yourself tells us volumes about your motivations.
Insinuations that five-figure payments somehow corroborate the truth of accusations are an extreme act of reckless journalism
----------
And I submit that your attempts to equate Cain and Clinton, without any more evidence than what we have seen to do, is an extreme act of reckless partisanship on your part. If you had any shame, you would ask your post be pulled. But I think you have shown you lack of shame with your Little Miss Innocent routine.