Clinton had a bimbo eruption squad. There was a telephone recording, if I am recalling correctly. The accusers had faces and names. He had a general reputation. Ultimately there was the dress. I am wondering if any of these accusations were made or bubbled beneath the surface when Cain ran for political office before, or is this all brand new?
I don’t know the answer to those questions, I don’t know if this is all just propped up nonsense... what I do know, is that I view the press with a jaundiced eye, but not with an ignorant one.
Face it, Cain on the national political scene was a nobody a few weeks ago, so who knows what if any of this is true.. I know his defenders will say its all just made up nonsense, and certainly Politico went rediculously activist media with its handling of it, but does anyone know if there is a fire behind any of this?
I can say I have been less than impressed with his handling of it, that’s for sure.. coming out accusing someone else of leaking with no evidence or proof, after fumbling for days. For whatever reason at least one woman was paid to keep quiet, while the defenders say that’s just someone cruising for cash which is possible, he should have known about this, knew it would be questionied, and been prepared to defend himself about it, and he certainly wasn’t.
If the guy doesn’t do due diligence on his own situation, what can be expected if he is in 1600 PA Avenue? Is he going to blame Russia for something that they had nothing to do with, just because someone “he claims” told him so, with no evidence?