[Sudetenland]

YOu lob insults well dirtbag, now let's see if you comprehend the word "reminiscent." Made no claim as to veracity, merely commented on the eerie resemblance to the claim of Kathleen Willey.

You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can't even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain's feet.

Seems we've been through this whole worship thing once before . . . oh yeah it was with Obama. You keep great company.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.

_____________________

I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.

But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.

Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.

THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?

And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.

If you have such evidence we are all ears....

[SeekAndFind]

RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.

_____________________

I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.

But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.

Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.

THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?

And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.

If you have such evidence we are all ears....

[SeekAndFind]

RE: You Cainiacs are really over the top kool aid drinkers, that you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past. Try being objective enough to wait for the facts rather than worshipping at Cain’s feet.

_____________________

I am not a Cainiac by any means. Let the best candidate be the nominee.

But I take exception to your charge that cain supporters “you can’t even entertain the possibility that your sainted candidate may actually have a sullied past”.

Before people (Cainiacs or non-Cainiacs included) conclude that he has a sullied past, LET’s LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.

THAT’s ALL WE ARE ASKING. WHERE IS IT?

And yeah, I am open to the idea that he may have had a sullied past ( no one is perfect ). But I sure as Hell DEMAND EVIDENCE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT before Icome to such a conclusion.

If you have such evidence we are all ears....

[dirtboy]

You make an easy target, troll. Your slimy partisan insinuations are not befitting FR.