The difference is the number of accusers and that they have contemporaneous corroboration of their claims. Thomas had one accuser who followed him to another job. SH claims rely on proving a pattern of behavior. That is what Paula Jones’ lawsuit against Clinton was about and why we learned the names of more women over time.
They say that, but they have produced nothing to support it. Why would anyone believe that such corroboration existed?
“contemporaneous corrobation” ???
Plain English please. “IT” happened years ago (whatever IT is). As far as I go, it’s just a matter of “he said, she said”. I don’t find them all that credible, but it’s just a matter of “she said, he said”, and they haven’t proven anything. - I’ve heard he’s willing to take a lie detector test. Are these women?