Sick of the Attacks on Herman Cain (Vanity)

11/06/2011 | Self

[FatherofFive]

Let’s not forget who the enemy is.

[LomanBill]

>>your guy Romney

Bzzzt. 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2793300/posts?page=706#706

 

FAIL again.

 

[MNJohnnie]

Again, screaming the lie louder doesn’t magically change your fiction about Cain to fact.

So how about you quit lying and make a case FOR your candidate?

[Timber Rattler]

People can see through what is going on.

Yeah, most of us figured out the libs and GOP-E game when they were going after Sarah Palin. Now that they are trying to turn the same nasty backstabbing tactics against Cain, no one is buying what they're peddling.

[Timber Rattler]

The thing about Politico is that is the also the weapon of choice for anti-TEA Party GOP-E operatives, who quietly send out hit pieces to Mike Allen, knowing full well that he will quickly distribute it to the MSM at large through his Journolist-style Playbook daily email newsletter.

Politico's Mike Allen: The Man the White House Wakes Up To

[stars & stripes forever]

I don’t know if you watched the Cain/Gingrich debate last night. I believe this is the winning ticket. Plus neither use teleprompters.

[org.whodat]

The polling source has never produced a reliable poll in my life time. Show me the same poll results on real clear politics.

[palmer]

A post is utterly lame when it contains a google search like “Perry+gay” or “Cain+gay” or something like that. Try again, this time with a link to a particular article from a reputable source.

[palmer]

with a melatonin surplus

Take it somewhere else, jerk.

[LomanBill]

Who is Scott Toomey, Parrot?

[palmer]

You?

[MNJohnnie]

Sorry slander bot, your are exposed as a fraud. You have no credibility anymore

[LomanBill]

FAIL.

Would vesting homosexual perverts like Scott Toomey with administrative power within the White Hut be CONSERVATIVE?

[palmer]

you have yet to demonstrate any sense of what is conservative. All you have posted so far is innuendo and allusions to racism. Are you a racist?

[LomanBill]

But my search didn’t contain the word “gay” - you inserted that connection all by yourself, genius.

How ‘bout a google search that highlights the historical results of vesting perverts with military and political power?

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=The+Pink+Swastika+site:www.freerepublic.com

[LomanBill]

>>Are you a racist?

 

Nope.  I can just differentiate between a REAL Tea Partyer - and the fake one peddled by Scott Toomey.

-----

  Actual Tea Partyer         VS Actual Tea Parroter --- well, except for times like...

“Herman Cain’s position on TARP:

On October 20, 2008, Herman Cain wrote, in an article in North Star Writers Group’s Herman Cain column #133, that “Wake up people! Owning a part of the major banks in America is not a bad thing. We could make a profit while solving a problem.””
http://hermancaintarp.com/about-herman-cain/herman-cain-supports-tarp/

...when he was showing his (Let's get) REAL  feathers.

Beautiful plumage, the Herman Blue.

-----

 

Now answer the question - is it CONSERVATIVE to vest homosexual perverts with political and military power?

     

[palmer]

Read through it briefly. You are making some of the same mistakes as Lively, intentionally or not. You are characterizing yourself as a hater, whether you mean to or not. You can be anti-gay without being a hater.

[LomanBill]

Is is CONSERVATIVE to vest homosexual perverts with political and military power?

YES or NO.