Charles, I have got to believe that you cannot think FR posters are to stupid to click your name for themselves. Because do, then it would clear up a few things.
I refuse to waste time with you in an attempt at serious debate because if posters who I believe are smart enough to click your name, or mine and wade through the posts back to that October 17th Cain thread that offends you so, they will discover hundreds of posts between us with you making wild-arse accusations and refusing to answer questions while accusing me of the same.
They will also discover you backtracking when after accusing me for several PAGES of not answering your questions, you had to admit that you ‘missed it’ and that I had indeed. You just disagreed with the answer.
In short Charles, I stand behind everything I have ever posted here. You have ducked, dodged, spun, lied, ignored, obsfucated and your post history which is there for the record, shows that. My goal is not to get people to ignore you, but to engage you with a secure knowlege of what you stand for.
And it is far from conservative, as even a casual reading of your posts displays for all to see.
Just look at your reply to Windflier above. You rant on and on about cain’s business practices and then in the same post admit GF was a ‘private company’ at the time and the records aren’t available for you to base your evaluation on.
That does not strike you as a pretty bizzarre way to go about it?
That's an assinine thing to say. I've asked you to provide a link to all these "liberal" things to make it easy for them. You haven't. Why not? They can click on my name, and see everything I write. But if you have examples, it would make it easier for them.
Again, I urge everybody to go through my posting history. I can guarantee you there will be things in there you will want to scream at me about. It won't be boring.
I refuse to waste time with you in an attempt at serious debate
I think that is clear to everyone who reads this thread.
October 17th Cain thread that offends you so
You are the one who showed up here complaining about that thread. I don't see how a thread could offend someone.
they will discover hundreds of posts between us with you making wild-arse accusations
The won't, but hopefully they will find that out for themselves and not take your word for it. Of course, they only need THIS thread to see who is making the wild accusations and not providing links to support them.
They will also discover you backtracking when after accusing me for several PAGES of not answering your questions, you had to admit that you ‘missed it’ and that I had indeed.
You mean, they will find that when I'm wrong, I admit my mistakes? That won't be a shock to most people, because that is actually what adults do.
In short Charles, I stand behind everything I have ever posted here.
You should really learn about that admitting mistakes thing. You have ducked, dodged, spun, lied, ignored, obsfucated and your post history which is there for the record, shows that
Again with the wild accusations with no evidence. WHere is the link? It's not hard, most of us know how to do it.
In this entire thread tonight, you have only "engaged" me in a single question based on a misunderstanding of the thread you were responding to. I answered that query fully, and you got upset because it wasn't short enough for you.
The rest of your comments are just personal insults and wild accusations. Which I am still responding to, as best I can given you provide no evidence and have no interest in serious conversation.