Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; All
Yes, and the USSC ruled Executive Privilege is real and stands the test of Constitutional Law.

USA vs Nixon being the relevant decision.

23 posted on 11/04/2011 4:47:23 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

Exactly why Clinton was shocked.

Post-Nixon
Clinton administration

In 1998, President Bill Clinton became the first President since Nixon to assert executive privilege and lose in court, when a Federal judge ruled that Clinton aides could be called to testify in the Lewinsky scandal.[7]

Later, Clinton exercised a form of negotiated executive privilege when he agreed to testify before the grand jury called by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr only after negotiating the terms under which he would appear. Declaring that “absolutely no one is above the law”, Starr said such a privilege “must give way” and evidence “must be turned over” to prosecutors if it is relevant to an investigation.


27 posted on 11/04/2011 4:56:30 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
It may be real but it has limits and this is probably not one of them...public interest overrides executive privacy interests in criminal prosectution for the truth. There is no national security interest.

......USSC

.... “To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of ‘a workable government’ and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III.” Because Nixon had asserted only a generalized need for confidentiality, the Court held that the larger public interest in obtaining the truth in the context of a criminal prosecution took precedence.........

61 posted on 11/04/2011 7:38:03 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
Yes executive privilege is real but it is not gratuitous or absolute. It didn't protect Nixon's tapes did it.
111 posted on 11/06/2011 4:08:44 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson