Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush: "Politico, You Failed ... Influence Isn't What You Thought It Was"
Real Clear Politics ^ | November 4, 2011 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/04/2011 1:51:29 PM PDT by opentalk

RUSH: I am starting to sense it. I am starting to see it. When I sense it, when I see it, it probably is true. That's been my track record. I think I detect the media heading into damage control on the Herman Cain story. A lot of media are. This day five now, and still nobody knows what he did. Not a single media outlet can report what he did!

Some are even suggesting that The Politico had no business running this story. These are other journalists who are beginning to say this. ... The media is also in damage control over the Occupy Oakland riots the night before last. I mean, yesterday the media was trying to pretend the Oakland protests were peaceful; the very model of a love fest, but now the truth is coming out along with some of the pictures and they're switching over to damage control mode -- and they're doing the same thing in the Herman Cain story.

Really, folks, five days now, and nobody knows what he did... Nobody knows still. Five days!

...No matter what happens here, every Republican candidate for the nomination -- every one of them -- is so superior to Barack Obama, it's laughable. Of course the Drive-Bys know that, and Democrats know that. But when you have the Washington Post and ABC News in their joint poll saying that 70% of Republicans don't care about the Herman Cain allegations, what that can be translated to is the following:

"Politico, you failed. You attempted, along with others in the mainstream media, to take the guy out, and you failed. Your influence isn't what you thought it was.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cain; doublestandard; journolistattacks; kenvogel; larrysinclair; politico; progressivemedia; smears; soros; underhanded; vogel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 last
To: Mr. K

“I think that is where we might differ- I didn’t see her as evil or treacherous- just stupid and naive.

The (demonstrably) lying testimony she gave was intended to destroy Clarence Thomas as a nominee and as a man. She knew exactly what she was doing.

Such conduct is not merely naive nor ignorant, but intentional, evil, and inexcusable.

Anita Hill sold her soul for the demonic approbation of her malignant handlers. Oh, and an University appointment.

But there is a God in Heaven.


61 posted on 11/15/2011 10:44:27 AM PST by TFMcGuire (Liberalism Is Hatred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson