Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2130368/

Uh, you missed the date of this study:

J Hyg (Lond). 1975 April; 74(2): 251–259.

Oooops.

From the abstract:

A comparison was made of the antibody response and subjective reactions to zonally-purified influenza vaccine in aqueous suspension and in peanut oil adjuvant 65-4.

Heh. A study of an influenza vaccine in the early 70s. Thanks for proving my previous post correct.

203 posted on 11/05/2011 2:36:15 PM PDT by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: TomB

Which of your posts are you referring to? In #177, you said claims that peanut oil was in vaccines is not true. The study says it happened.

When did Adjuvant 65 stop being used?


207 posted on 11/05/2011 2:41:50 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson