Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘60 Minutes’ Ambushes… Nancy Pelosi?
Breitbart TV ^ | November 4, 2011 | Breitbart TV

Posted on 11/04/2011 3:19:37 AM PDT by Makana

"60 Minutes" challenged Nancy Pelosi on her conflict of interest while Speaker and facilitating financial reform while being involved with credit card companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; ehtics; financialregulation; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Savage played the audio of the questioning. Pelosi said that Congress provides “protections” for industries. It was a tacit admission that Congress is in the protection racket business, picking winners and losers depending on who plays ball. As far as substance abuse is concerned, I’m convinced she’s mentally disturbed e.g. crazy.


21 posted on 11/04/2011 5:01:14 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Is Botox a controlled substance?


22 posted on 11/04/2011 5:04:01 AM PDT by Humble Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

LOL!

Comments like this make FR a very interesting place!


23 posted on 11/04/2011 5:12:26 AM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Melt her down and recover the fiberglass...


24 posted on 11/04/2011 5:56:36 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Makana
Any lazy journalist could make a career out of comparing Pelosi’s public statements against herself, and reality.

For too long, this woman has gotten away with making the most ridiculous reality-free public pronouncements. AP assigns an army to fact-check Palin, but won't waste time fact-checking this woman, even when she was speaker of the house.

25 posted on 11/04/2011 6:12:08 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

How stupid does someone have to be to vote for somebody like Nancy Pelosi?


26 posted on 11/04/2011 6:24:55 AM PDT by Savage Beast (A backwoods southern lawyer is a safer trustee for your soul than a Washington politician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
How stupid does someone have to be to vote for somebody like Nancy Pelosi?


27 posted on 11/04/2011 6:28:24 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("To Serve Manatee" is a cookbook!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wita

So true. They swear to protect and defend it yet as soon as they’re elected they are the ones attacking it, destroying it right off the bat. I look at the 2nd Amendment for example: If I’m not mistaken, it’s the only right in the Constitution that implicitly states “Shall not be infringed”. Has the word “not” taken on some kind of invisibility in the English language? Where somehow these people just skip right over it when reading a sentence? Are they using the Bill Clinton method of dissecting sentences “it depends what is is”? “Oh ‘not” can mean ‘definitely’! Yes, pass the law banning all firearms! the Constitution says ‘Shall definitely be infringed’”?


28 posted on 11/04/2011 8:30:36 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Mark Halperin - Learned the hard way what happens when you speak the truth on PMSNBC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

‘Shall not be infringed’

To the two of us, the Constitution and the oath taken by military and public servants has great meaning. Unfortunately the majority of folks form their own gospel of government, just as they do their gospel of Jesus Christ. Believing what they will, in total disregard of scripture to the contrary.

I’m quite sure the only way that the importance of the founding documents much less the principles on which they were founded, will ever be reestablished as the foundation for the Republic will be, when public trails for treason become more important than the present overwhelming need to abort the next 10 or fifteen generations of Americans.


29 posted on 11/04/2011 10:52:14 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson