[CharlesWayneCT]

But Cain seemed unconvinced, telling Hannity "there aren't enough breadcrumbs that leads us to any other place."

Shouldn't he be campaigning for the job he wants, rather than pretending he's a crime scene investigator?

And there is something disturbing about how Cain, and his campaign manager, keep saying that there is "evidence", or that someone else "confirmed" something, when all they are talking about is their own quotes.

Does Cain really think that showing Forbes quoted him is some independent investigation?

Worse, does he expect us to forget that he personally claimed it was Anderson. He didn't say he was just repeating something he read in Forbes. Not that it would matter, since Forbes was just repeating what he told them.

Is this how you make a story go away?

[MHGinTN]

With such expert analysis coming from puffadders like you this innuendo lynching will never end. You must be so proud ...

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

I want Cain to show the “proof “ he had when he accused Perry...so far, no proof, except “Well, that guy that works for Perry did it” and now “well, the magazine said Perry did it”....

And now, Cain “just wants to get off the merry-go-round”????

On this one, Perry has taken the high road and not gotten on the “merry-go-round “.

[X-spurt]

This “scandal or not” is just another in a series of doing/saying something not smart and have to walk it back in Keystone Cops style.

Cain may really have a great deal of the qualities we need, but the gimmicks and stumbles aren't reassuring. Hope he can recover and learn from this.