Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjsheridan5

That’s why I said “very little POLITICAL experience.” I wasn’t intending to belittle Cain’s resume. But politically, like Obama in 2008, he IS a neophyte.


46 posted on 11/03/2011 8:02:03 PM PDT by order66.exe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: order66.exe

I know. As I said, I didn’t mean to be ornery. I have just seen this comparison too many times. I personally feel that political experience is overrated, and in many cases counterproductive. An ideal president would either be from higher echelon of the military, or of business — not from the political world. This is simply because the presidency is unlike any other political position, and has significant parallels to reaching the top of either the military, or big business.

Barack Obama’s political inexperience was relevant, since he had no other experience. Herman Cain’s political inexperience is of dubious importance, simply because he has such a track record of success.

I agree with your overall point, but that comparison always irks me, because so many try to use it to diminish Cain.


47 posted on 11/03/2011 8:10:27 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: order66.exe; jjsheridan5
But politically, like Obama in 2008, he IS a neophyte.

I beg to differ. Herman Cain is no neophyte and neither is 0bama. Cain is much experienced in the politics of the board room. 0bama is experienced in the politics of community organizing ala Saul Alinsky.

54 posted on 11/04/2011 5:43:03 AM PDT by foxfield (Sarah Palin, America's "girl next door".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson