To: loucon
“At the bottom of the new version:
(CORRECTIONS: A previous version of this story mentioned that a source witnessed Cain and the woman entering a taxi together. This was incorrect.
The previous version also mentioned that the woman awoke in Cain’s bed — the source only claimed that the woman awoke in Cain’s apartment.
The previous version incorrectly attributed comments from one source to the other source.)”
—Unbelievable!! Now they’re taking out the other part about the witness seeing Cain and a woman in the taxi??!! What the h-ll is going on here?!
347 posted on
11/03/2011 11:49:54 AM PDT by
Qbert
("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
To: Qbert
Unbelievable!! Now they’re taking out the other part about the witness seeing Cain and a woman in the taxi??!! What the h-ll is going on here?!A blatant leftist smear.
354 posted on
11/03/2011 11:52:48 AM PDT by
ohioWfan
(Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
To: Qbert; D-fendr
No Kidding, what is going on over there at PJ? (shake head)
To: Qbert
What is going on here, perrys people running their lickers and then getting told by attorneys they can get a court date if that statement is not true.
366 posted on
11/03/2011 11:55:40 AM PDT by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
To: Qbert
“The previous version incorrectly attributed comments from one source to the other source.”
I'm really glad they cleared that one up. You wouldn't want to incorrectly attribute a claim to the wrong anonymous source. That would be bad reporting.
370 posted on
11/03/2011 11:58:06 AM PDT by
07Jack
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson