Skip to comments.
Obama On Bad Economy: "I'm Less Interested In Allocating Blame" (video)
RealClearPolitics ^
| November 2, 2011
| RealClearPolitics
Posted on 11/02/2011 5:20:09 AM PDT by i88schwartz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: i88schwartz
He is delusional
2
posted on
11/02/2011 5:22:50 AM PDT
by
fedupjohn
("JUST LIKE YOU, I'M NOT FOR SALE!....Sarah Palin 2012)
To: i88schwartz
Who listens to this asshat any more?
3
posted on
11/02/2011 5:23:26 AM PDT
by
Stosh
To: i88schwartz
Typical Obama.
Now that the blame is undeniably 100% his, and he can no longer shrug any of it off on "the previous administration" he is "less interested in allocating blame".
4
posted on
11/02/2011 5:32:59 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Comments now include 25% more sarcasm at for no additional charge...)
To: i88schwartz
I think we are better off now than we would have been if I hadn't taken all the steps that we took
You know, I just hate this line, and libs I know use it all the time. How could they POSSIBLY know? How could they? I point out to them the Reagan era and how his administration handled it, and the prosperity that followed, yet that is rejected outright.
To: WayneS
Typical leftist, and typical sinful human -
when the blame is clearly yours, say “let’s not point fingers of blame”,
but when it is clearly someone else’s, point at him.
6
posted on
11/02/2011 5:34:39 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Thorliveshere
Like my pastor says, we should not be surprised when worldly people behave in worldly ways.
And my correlary is that we should not be surprised when irrational people (liberals) say irrational, baseless things.
7
posted on
11/02/2011 5:36:00 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: MrB
8
posted on
11/02/2011 5:36:48 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Comments now include 25% more sarcasm at for no additional charge...)
To: Thorliveshere
You know, I just hate this line, and libs I know use it all the time. How could they POSSIBLY know? How could they? I point out to them the Reagan era and how his administration handled it, and the prosperity that followed, yet that is rejected outright. It's just Obama's opinion, and so far he's been 100% wrong about what he told us his plan would do for the economy. Why should we think his ideas about what it would have been like without it are any better?
To: i88schwartz
"I'm less interested in allocating blame then just making sure that we're taking every step we need to, to move the economy forward. What has happened to all the good reporters in the country?
The natural follow-up to that response would have been: "Well, Mr. President, if that is so...why is it that all your administration does is blame the Republicans and the previous administration? Is it that you are only interested in not assigning blame to democrats or do you honestly feel the democrats share no blame at all for the economy?"
To: i88schwartz
Obama On Bad Economy: "I'm Less Interested In Allocating Blame" Translation: If I try to blame others then people will realize that it was my fault.
11
posted on
11/02/2011 5:53:35 AM PDT
by
SoJoCo
To: i88schwartz
Obama On Bad Economy: "I'm Less Interested In Allocating Blame"Ha ha. If I was a total screwup like you, I'm sure I'd not be looking to lay blame either.
You have sucked, sucked bad, since day one and you, and only you, own every bit of it. Enjoy your legacy numbnuts.
12
posted on
11/02/2011 5:55:18 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
To: Thorliveshere
Obama is an A**wipe of large proportions.
13
posted on
11/02/2011 5:55:23 AM PDT
by
DooDahhhh
(ma)
To: i88schwartz
Too funny...
Now that he 100% owns this economy, he doesn’t want to “allocate blame.” LOL!
14
posted on
11/02/2011 6:12:37 AM PDT
by
nhwingut
(Draft Palin '12... For 3rd Party Run)
To: i88schwartz
I'm responsible; but I'm not to blame.
I think I'm reading this right.
15
posted on
11/02/2011 6:33:36 AM PDT
by
Pietro
To: i88schwartz
Hmmm. Move the economy forward to oblivion (as per Zero’s policies) return to prosperity.
Not a tough choice.
16
posted on
11/02/2011 6:36:31 AM PDT
by
rod1
To: Thorliveshere
Outcome-based testing is all we ask.
Zero came, the economy tanked, Zero went.
17
posted on
11/02/2011 6:38:20 AM PDT
by
rod1
To: i88schwartz
I’m blah blah blah blah blah blah blah It’s Bush’s fault blah blah blah .........
To: i88schwartz
HEY YOU! Yeah you, Dictator-in-your-own-mind Obama!
When you say “ - - - I’m less interested in allocating blame - - -, “ what we hear is that you cannot accept responsibility for your actions.
Hence, you, Obama are a coward.
Coward in Chief Obama.
19
posted on
11/02/2011 6:57:03 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
To: MrB
A man wrapped-up in himself makes a very small package.
20
posted on
11/02/2011 7:24:48 AM PDT
by
IAGeezer912
(If government ownership of business is so great, why aren't the N. Koreans filthy rich?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson