Don't bother. You are completely clueless about the point I'm making. You've already been body-snatched by accepting the faulty premise that the provision of basic nutrition can be withheld at the whim of another.
A newborn baby cannot feed itself, but by your theory a mother has no obligation to feed it if she deems it "extraordinary".
BTW, your example of starving people not being given food doesn't wash. These people are capable of picking up the food and feeding themselves if the food is put in front of them. We are talking about those who are physically unable to feed themselves. But I think you knew that...
Old Swainy was very polished (although not as much as he thought he was) in dirty debating. People like him often have an exaggerated opinion of their own intellectual superiority and enjoy “toying” with us rubes.