Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamHouston

Pat is on MSNBC as the token conservative because the left views him as a racist nut and he is always trashing the GOP.


5 posted on 10/31/2011 9:54:55 PM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lone star annie

Pat is the token Conservative on MSBHO because Pat Buchanan is how the left sees Conservatives.


18 posted on 10/31/2011 11:50:34 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: lone star annie

The GOP deserves to be trashed when it puts idiots like Michael Steele in charge of the GOP and selects John McCain as the Republican nominee.


21 posted on 11/01/2011 12:25:21 AM PDT by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: lone star annie; All
Pat is on MSNBC as the token conservative because the left views him as a racist nut and he is always trashing the GOP.

I doubt that's the reason. It's more that he's sharp, colorful, and brings a wealth of of historical and political knowledge to the table--in an industry dominated by airheads. The worst sin in cable news is not being considered "a bad person"; it's being a bore, and Buchanan is never that. In 1966, Pat became Richard Nixon's first paid full-time staffer, not because Pat viewed him as a real conservative, but because Pat viewed him as the most viable part-time conservative likely to arrest America's leftist slide to some extent in the wake of Barry Goldwater's debacle in 1964. Pat always fought for conservative policies, whether under Nixon, Ford, or Reagan. MSNBC also has has on "Republicans" like Mark McKinnon, Steve Schmidt, and Nicolle Wallace, social liberal alls, all of them reliable antagonists of social conservatives, Sarah Palin in particular. They're always welcome on Rachel Maddow's show, unlike Pat Buchanan, who did not hesitate to burn his bridges with her.

And I think there's another factor that contributes to Pat's longevity at MSNBC. Because it's an overwhelmingly liberal network, liberals pull their punches and don't call for a full-on boycott of their favorite network, however much they demand that they fire Pat. If Pat worked at CNN, let alone Fox, liberals would show no restraint in their assault on the network as a whole.
86 posted on 11/02/2011 10:53:16 PM PDT by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." --Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson