[CharlesWayneCT]

You cared enough to call me wrong.

I said: That would require him to be part of the agreement, so he would be bound by it. No way he was part of the agreement and didn’t remember it.

Cain has now said he was not part of the agreement, and was not bound by it. So I was right.

You said: So you think the NRA worked out a settlement but didn't get the accused party to sign off on letting it go?

I did, and I was right -- Cain says he doesn't remember signing off on it, and doesn't think he did. You were wrong to suggest it was stupid; it turns out it was the truth.

Maybe next time Cain has one of these issues, you'll wait for his several clarifications before you go out on a limb and get left hanging out to dry.

[TigersEye]

You had two paragraphs in post #62 that contradicted each other. I was just wondering which one you were standing by to say you were right.

I guess, like Barack 0bama or Mitt Romney, if you take both sides of a position you can always claim to be right.