You, moose, have all the markings of a troll. In 10+ years at this site, to the best of my recollection, Ive never called any poster by that term. So you are really *special* If you are not a paid Obot, you should apply and at least get paid. Youve spent a good deal of your FR time trashing both Cain and Palin in the standard Obot passive-aggressive style.
Your comment to which I replied had nothing whatsoever to do with revealing the facts, only Cain’s response: Nice try but I would have a hard time trusting somebody who doesnt remember having been sued for sexual harassment to run this country...especially if the accusations were false.
Having been called naïve as to the real world in which powerful people such as Cain operate, you pull the old hypocrisy card, and change the topic: If this were obama or clinton or romney or perry youd be screaming for the facts to be revealed. You know it. We know it. Whos this we by the way? Pure Obot.
So, your initial comment was about Cains memory of events TWENTY (20) years ago, that by your lights he should remember with perfect clarity, but you then change the subject to exposing the facts. Your initial comment appears to have conceded the allegations as not true.
If you really cared about truth and the facts, you would be calling for the accusers to step forward and lay out their case, offering Cain a fair and open rebuttal (as I have done over the past 24 hours) but you seem perfectly okay with just letting the anonymous smear sit out there, and finding fault with Cains recollection of 20 year old events. Yeah, you are some Christian. Ha!
I am about one thing only...getting the white house back. This issue could sink Cain. He had better get out in front of it. So far he has bungled it.
If you think otherwise then defend your position without resorting to the old palinite fallback of...."I don't agree with you so you're a troll."
So, go ahead, tell us how this issue doesn't hurt Cain and then tell us exactly how he has not botched his response to this point.