Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand

He didn’t say there was no settlement. He said he did not know the details of any settlement. Geesh.


4 posted on 10/31/2011 2:56:39 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: WashingtonSource
He didn’t say there was no settlement. He said he did not know the details of any settlement. Geesh

Clip this morning: (from memory) "I don't think there was any settlement, but if there was I hope it wasn't for much..."

6 posted on 10/31/2011 2:58:10 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WashingtonSource

It may be hard to imagine for some of you who are not executives or business owners that it is quite possible to have a settlement that you don’t remember or had no hand in settling. It may be even harder to imagine lawsuits that have no basis in reality other than generating money.

If you are not in the arena then getting sued is a big deal and you may even believe that if there is smoke then thee must be at least a little fire. But depending on how big an arena you play in these types of settlements could be a monthly occurrence and not very memorable ones at that.


9 posted on 10/31/2011 3:02:12 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WashingtonSource

No, he said he did not know there WAS a settlement, was surprised to learn there was a settlement, and hoped it wasn’t for much.

Now he says he remembers his counsel telling him about the settlement. That would be an odd way of saying it if his counsel told him TODAY. More likely he forgot all about the settlement, but now that he is thinking about it and talking to others, he is slowly remembering things.

Except he had 10 days to do this, so that’s not a good explanation. But it can’t be (as the article speculates) that he was being “coy” this morning — because what he said was clearcut, not coy, and if he really knew this much about the settlement this morning, what he said this morning would have been a lie, and I don’t believe Cain would lie to be coy.


54 posted on 10/31/2011 9:38:11 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WashingtonSource

As a stockbroker for over 25 years, I was only involved in one lawsuit. The company settled out of court, denying any fault. Only by chance did I find out they paid the woman asserting improper trade practices, $5,000 just to get rid of the headache. This lawsuit had nothing to do with sexual harrassment.

In many businesses one is told to have no further contact with the accuser during the entire process but only with company HR, attorneys, regulators etc who investigate.


74 posted on 11/01/2011 8:16:56 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Common sense although common knowledge is seldom common practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WashingtonSource

The way I heard it, from a couple of news sources, was that the women were fired and were given 3 months severance pay.....


84 posted on 11/02/2011 5:08:54 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson