Sheesh...
You and vick are still trying to come from the perspective that this was an error. It wasn’t. How do we know that, because it did not happen across the board. It was specific. And not just specific to Minor v Happersett and other case names. Or to case citations, there was text removed, parts of the cases themselves. Parts that include sentances like (paraphrasing here) ‘Natural Born Citizenship which is important only when determining eligiblity for president of the United States,’. Yea a sentance like that got erased.
You and Vick are welcome to continue to believe it was an accident. I strongly disagree. It is too deliberate, too specific, and every coder I have spoken to (and that includes a PhD) has literally laughed when this was shown to them. Its stupid crazy to try and asert that it was an error, or an accident. It had to be done specifically. With deliberate choice and information behind it which helped to identify what needed to be removed and why.
It’s no accident.
I repest, this was specific, the text removed related to citizenship and removed only specific text leaving the rest. That does not happen on accident with Regex. It really is as simple as that.