To: goldstategop
"If it were enacted, off to New York the South Dakotan tourist could go, 9-millimeter Glock in tow. Thats not liberty. More like lunacy."
The lunacy is being required to surrender arms and render yourself defenseless when merely crossing into another state. Despite, being thoroughly vetted and authorized by duly constituted state and federal law enforcement entities to acquire, posses, and carry.
7 posted on
10/30/2011 7:23:45 AM PDT by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: PowderMonkey
Federal and state law enforcement officials can already carry concealed nationwide, regardless of local law. Liberals just don’t want the little people to have the same right cops do!
11 posted on
10/30/2011 7:29:35 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: PowderMonkey
The lunacy is being required to surrender arms and render yourself defenseless when merely crossing into another state. Despite, being thoroughly vetted and authorized by duly constituted state and federal law enforcement entities to acquire, posses, and carry. And liberty is not having obtain a permit to carry open or concealed, much less having to obtain a permit to own a gun. (Four states have it right, only 53 to go. ;-)
29 posted on
10/30/2011 8:17:38 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(The only thing straight, white, Christian males get is the blame for everything.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson