To: fightinJAG
And by rich they are talking about people whose taxable income is about $300,000 a year. A nice sum, but that includes ,many couples and of course small businesses. Dear Lord but they have such a magical understanding of what wealth is! Like it comes out of a bottle in the form of a genie.
13 posted on
10/28/2011 10:08:37 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(Back in Jefferson)
To: RobbyS
And don’t get me started on Libs’ definition of a “job.”
Good grief. Just today I was thinking of emailing Thomas Sowell and asking him to write an essay on what actually constitutes a “job” in economic, as opposed to political, terms.
17 posted on
10/28/2011 10:12:37 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
To: RobbyS
Dear Lord but they have such a magical understanding of what wealth is! Like it comes out of a bottle in the form of a genie.I consider wealth a relative term of Net Worth, not Income.
39 posted on
10/28/2011 10:50:30 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Too many people are incapable of critical thinking. Common sense isn't common anymore.)
To: RobbyS
And by rich they are talking about people whose taxable income is about $300,000 a year. A nice sum, but that includes ,many couples and of course small businesses. Dear Lord but they have such a magical understanding of what wealth is! Like it comes out of a bottle in the form of a genie.BS.
Take all taxes into account and the "rich", for purposes of taxation begins around 75k.
Do we keep having to revisit the graphs as to who actually pays most of the income taxes?
It ain't the "rich" and it ain't the parasites.
46 posted on
10/28/2011 11:50:23 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson