Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: New Jersey Realist
Adendum to the above post #29

As I stated perviously, the Constitution does not define natural-born.

Because it was common knowledge as that above link will point out.

33 posted on 10/27/2011 9:34:38 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH

I’ll read your link but I think we’re going around in circles - although I enjoy a healthy discussion - and lets face it, SCOTUS will not look at this issue because it is very confusing. I would argue that if descendants of imported slaves can claim to be natural born citizens even though no one ever took a naturalization exam, then the matter is settled.


35 posted on 10/27/2011 9:41:24 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson