Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

“as distinguished from foreigners and aliens”

But persons born on U.S. soil are not aliens, as

“The definition of NBC as offered by the SCOTUS in Minor v. Happersett is self-limiting”

Says who? Show me the part where it says persons born on U.S. soil to citizen parents and *only* such persons are NBCs. Or, failing that, show me where it says native born citizens are not NBCs. You can’t, because it doesn’t, because that was not at issue. Just so happens that native born citizens are also natural born citizens, because there is no such thing as a citizen from birth who is not a natural born citizen, since to be a natural born citizen means to be a citizen from birth.


138 posted on 10/29/2011 1:29:04 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane
But persons born on U.S. soil are not aliens, as

They are aliens if they are NOT born to citizen parents. That what the "distinguished from foreigners and aliens" phrase means. That's what makes it self-limiting. Under the Treaty of 1783, people born in this country of British parents were British subjects, not U.S. citizens. Those born to U.S. citizens in this country were natural-born citizens.

140 posted on 10/29/2011 10:28:49 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson