[SoConPubbie]

It'd be nice if you read the article first before making any comment. I'm still deciding so I don't have a horse at this moment. However, comment like this doesn't help anybody.

Yea, it would, wouldn't it.

I'm sure I'm not the first to do it, and I certainly won't be the last, but as the author has proven in the past, he is far from a reliable conservative.

He takes Myth to task for promising to build a border fence, but refuses to take Rick "Open-Borders" Perry to task for his refusal to build the wall.

So forgive me the fault of not reading the dribble of a moderate talking down to conservatives.

[fightinJAG]

So he didn’t criticize Perry on every last breath he’s made? So what.

The author wrote a scathing take-down of what really matters at this moment in Perry’s campaign: his newly released, big, name-in-lights “flat” tax plan.

It stinks. The author said so in overwhelming turns.

I don’t see how the fact that he didn’t criticize everything else there may be to criticize about Perry is relevant to anything except time and space limitations in the New York Post.

[paudio]

My apology for sounded harsh. But yeah, the current candidates have so many holes that journalists can cherry pick whichever fit their arguments. I’m not for Perry, as I’m still deciding, but I start to see having too many debates probably are not that beneficial for the eventual Republican nominee. There are just too many things that journalists can harvest.