Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
Cain was polling in single digits for the first half year of his campaign. I’m guessing you didn’t think he was a loser then.

Your boy crashed down into the single digits after being at 30%. Cain has gone straight up from Day One.

Big difference.

122 posted on 10/27/2011 12:22:20 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81
Cain has gone straight up from Day One.

Actually, day 150 or so. Yes, if Perry hadn't started out with a high poll numbers, but had instead come in with 4%, he'd look a lot better now, theoretically.

But as I said in another post, McCain was high in the polls, dropped to single digits, and came back up when people started really paying attention, which they are not today.

In a typical poll, 68% of the respondents say they are not committed to the candidate choice they report, which means they could easily change their minds. In one recent Iowa poll, only 30% of those who chose Cain said they were committed to his candidacy -- meaning of his 31% number, only about 10% was firm.

Polls are interesting snapshots into the minds of voters. Anybody who makes decisions on which candidate to support based on a poll is an idiot.

124 posted on 10/27/2011 12:32:17 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson