Posted on 10/26/2011 6:43:12 AM PDT by Kaslin
A One World Government will include Muslims, which means that eventually all non-believers will be murdered.
No thanks!
If there are no countries, where do you call “home”?
Democracy is the road to socialism. -Karl Marx
Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism. -V.I. Lenin
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism .-Karl Marx
“If there are no other countries, where can you flee to?”
You can’t.... and THAT makes domination INEVITIBLE AND INESCAPABLE.
However... Socialists call it equality.
Thatcher was right.
This was inevitable and predictable from the very beginning. A couple of dozen countries with hatreds for one another that went back centuries, different philosophy s, languages, religions. You name it. That it took this long is amazing in itself. The thing that has kept the “UNITED STATES of AMERICA together for so long, Civil War notwithstanding, is language, culture and a general adherence to a Christian philosophy. Those who would destroy us will do everything to destroy those fundamental legs of out society. You see it in play every day.
No where to run.
Then we can possibly look forward to a world of ‘Logan’s Run’ in real life
and enough control over mind and body to make one wish they were dead. IMO
Yeah.. Imagine no Hell below us, above us only sky... no possessions... no religion...
No thanks. Pol Pot imagined that for Cambodia. It didn’t go particularly well.
My family has been in the US for 4 generations but we still keep in touch with the relative in Europe. This is what I’ve learned:
1) The Polish side hates the Russians, REALLY hates to Ukrainians and doesn’t trust the Germans.
2) The French fear the Germans, loathe the British and believe the Spanish and Italians are filthy people.
3) The Irish hate EVERYBODY who is not Irish.
4) The Italians think the Greeks are pigs, the Croats are modern day Nazis and the Swizz are snobs.
What a One-World Government Looks Like
California
—This was inevitable and predictable from the very beginning.—
Reminds me of some weddings I’ve been to, and the subsequent marriages followed by divorce.
And the analogy fits pretty nicely, actually. Anybody that really knew them knew they should not have gotten married. This surprises nobody that was paying attention.
And the meaning of Salaam (peace) is the absence of opposition to Islam.
From what I have seen of people, I don’t think some form of world government would ever work. Thinking people, as opposed to writers of silly songs, understand the sheer military power that it would take to suppress the identities of the worlds cultures. It is a Satanic vision to destroy the cultures of the world. It would take a very brutal heavy boot on the neck of the world to impose a Pax Romana. The Romans only could control part of their known world. We did in this country get the Indian tribes to quit butchering each other for entertainment, but even that was a long process and many of the tribes still exist as a subculture. I think the only chance would be the invention of a new weapon, and this time, in the hands of a very malevolent government. The United States was the only country that was in that position briefly in human history and fortunately for the world it was us and not the Nazis who had the bomb.
excellent post
It’s not our fault that nobody is as awesome as the Irish.
Agreed. I remember talkshow host, Chuck Harder, made this point back in the 1990s where you have 1500 separate cultures in the world. There is no way you’re going to “get them to sing the Coca-Cola song in perfect harmony.” (as he put it) Sure you might use force but it will fail eventually as things fall apart. If you think how the Islamic world uses a lot of IED’s now, it will skyrocket as everyone and has brother starts using them. Look how Afghanistan fought the Russians or the Viet-Cong/NVA the US and take it to a global scale. You might have cultures that are generally enemies team up to fight the NWO much like how both sides in the Irish conflict took potshots at the British.
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism .-Karl Marx
Interesting that Karl Marx said that when Islam says basically the same thing about “peace”, that it is submission to Islam.
If the good people end up losing the world to the socialists and the muzzies, those two will obviously have to go to war with each other. Who will win?
This is human nature.
I saw it in Asia in the navy years ago: The Japanese hated and looked down on everybody except the Chinese, whom they merely hated, but respected somewhat. Everybody hated the Japanese. The chinese looked down on everybody. The Filipinos hated the Japanese, of course, and resented the highly successful Chinese in their midst, and everyone around Asia thought the Filipinos were subhuman. Any adjacent countries with different languages and cultures typically hated and suspected each other.
Amongst Buddhist temples established in the US for Southeast Asia refugees and immigrants after Vietnam, the Vietnamese would only go if the temple had a Thai or Vietnamese monk, Thais would only go to a Thai monk, Cambodians only to a Vietnamese monk, Burmese only a Burmese monk, or a Thai monk in a pinch.
In the hospitals in Honolulu, the Japanese immigrants and descendants would only go to Kapiolani, with a largely Japanese medical staff, the Chinese and the Filipinos only to St. Francis with a largely Chinese medical staff.
A one world government is only the dream of Marxists and Muslims, who love to dominate and tell others how to live, as well as naive useful idiots drenched in quasi-Marxist dreams. When an institution such as the UN is finally created, we see it attracting only the corrupt and the power hungry and the useful idiots.
a one-world-government will probably look a lot like Facebook, structurally. And like this:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.