You made this statement about ME. It is a lie. I asked you to substantiate it from ANY of my posts on this thread. You cannot. That makes it an ad hominem attack. Just like the rest of your obfuscation.
I trust an honest reader of this thread to judge whether you have been engaged in debate or behaving like a panicked corporate shill, attempting to denigrate your opposition and argue based on selective evidence...
Then it must have been someone else who claimed that taking issue with this study meant they were "pimping health hazards" (HFCS). Anyone who said such a thing believes in something that is founded in emotion, not sound science. This person, whomever he is, is in possession of a bizarro belief system based in ignorance or is intentionally disregarding the facts.
Allowing my comments on this thread to cause you to label me a "shill" must also be based on some bizarre belief system that has nothing to do with sound science. I'd expect someone making such a claim to defend that lame assertion, but you are incapable of doing anything other than whining about alleged ad hominems.
An honest reader of this thread would see something very different than what you see. You're looking at this thread with a jaundiced eye because my take on this is very different from your bizarre and anti-science based feelings.
It appears you don't like the tone of my posts to you. Maybe you should grow some thicker skin if your fist post to someone is going to call them an industry shill...or the purveyor of corn in search of a customer...ADM is evil blah, blah, blah kind of idiocy.
There's no panic in my approach to this. You can either provide evidence to support whatever it is you're arguing for or you can't. So far you've offered nothing but complaints.