Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmmmm....just as Obama is setting the Middle East on fire..he is weakening America's defenses. What could go wrong?
1 posted on 10/25/2011 7:48:29 AM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: penelopesire
President Barack Obama's goal of reducing the number of nuclear weapons.

She means his goal of reducing the number of nuclear weapons to zero.

75 posted on 10/25/2011 12:46:09 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

Wouldn’t it be faster & cheaper to let it dismantle itself...over the Ayatollah’s head?


76 posted on 10/25/2011 1:06:59 PM PDT by Stayfree (Find out the truth at Lawyers-Lawsuits.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

It should have been used on the Hajj.


79 posted on 10/25/2011 1:15:44 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire
Ok, so they *say* they dismantled the last bomb. But what about the MISSILES?

Tell me we haven't lost our freakin collective minds.

90 posted on 10/25/2011 9:05:26 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire
The B53 was obsolete because only one bomber--the B-52H--could carry this bomb. Even the B-1B was never cleared to carry this bomb, because its non-aerodynamic bomb casing and sheer size made it impractical to carry in the front bomb bay of the B-1B even if the partition between the front two bomb bays were removed.

It was more practical to carry a larger number of lower-yield 200 to 400 kT B61 bombs, especially with the higher bombing accuracy offered by low altitude drops and the ability to carry more bombs to attack multiple targets.

91 posted on 10/25/2011 9:07:47 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire
Dismantling these are stupid because those of us who live in reality know nuclear weapons will be around until the end of mankind. We are never going to get rid of our weapons and everyone knows it. They will always be on earth, because there will never be a way for the world to destroy them all at the same time, without any doubt they got them all, and then keeping them from ever being made again. If we did live in this fantasy world it might just make conventional war between two enemies who formerly had nukes breakout. We will never have complete peace.
101 posted on 10/26/2011 6:00:23 AM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (Support Herman Cain in the Republican Primary! Donate and Campaign for Herman Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

A significant milestone for what and who?

Read State Dept Publication 5277 Freedom from War. You’ll find out who and what.


107 posted on 10/26/2011 9:36:06 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

The dirtier radiation fallout dangerous weapons are lower yield ones, but in lib land, it does not compute.

A stupid fat dog would not enlist jackals and wolves to fight a master for free food, only liberals do that.


112 posted on 10/26/2011 3:28:15 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

we won’t love it when his plan comes together...
what a POS POTUS.. I wonder what the generals are thinking, they must see the destruction of our country before them by ohbamma mamba jamma lenin khoemeini’s policies as intentional, do they have a backup plan if ordered by the president to block the polling booths in time of martial law..


113 posted on 10/26/2011 3:43:21 PM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

Seriously, it isn’t about the size of the bomb or how powerful it is, not even when they started dismantling, it is about the white flag this freak is waving to the world. He is systematically dismantling everything this country stands for. It is one of two things either he is intentionally weakening this countries, strength, finances and constitution for an overthrow. Or he is desperate for votes and is throwing a bone to every group that is out there. Either way, this nation will never be the same after this terrorist leaves office.


115 posted on 10/26/2011 3:59:41 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

It would be cheaper to dispose of these 10 miles up over Iran or other locations in the Middle East:)


118 posted on 10/27/2011 3:46:00 AM PDT by Evergolightly (One's conclusions are founded in the path travelled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson