Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dan on the right

In your plan you say give the holder $2500 dollars to vacate , then sell the house at market Prices.

That idea doesn’t make sense to me.

Why not just write off the present mortgage, have the house appraised and let the present occupant buy it again at market price, if he can make the payments?


15 posted on 10/24/2011 8:36:04 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer

Well, if you’re presuming that the people who qualify aren’t paying, the occupant won’t qualify for a new loan.

What you’re referring to would be a plan to simply reduce the balance to current market value. Which, again, could probably work better than what they have been doing, except that it would invalidate an existing contract if forced by the government. However, designing some sort of tax or write-off benefit for the lenders in question (and the true investors and securitized owners behind the loan, that’s the harder part of the equation) would make it a bit easier of a sell.


19 posted on 10/24/2011 8:41:22 AM PDT by RockinRight (My train of thought has derailed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
Without any down payment? I think not..

If you "buy something" with NO $$$ down.then you have NO equity..you're a renter...and you'll bail again at the first problem..

27 posted on 10/24/2011 8:53:22 AM PDT by ken5050 (Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
I would be all for writing the loan down to, say, 80% of current market; have the borrower pay on that, but if he sells it for more, the bank gets some of the chargeoff back (but share this so the owner has incentive to keep paying).

Sounds good, however, many are not paying because they can't and/or won't. Why pay when you can live rent free for up to 5 years (2 to 3 being the norm). Some are out of work - awful situation, and some just are taking advantage of the system. Hard to distinguish who is who- which it is better just pay them to go.

Another thing. In banking, the accounting rules absolutely punish a bank who cuts a deal with any borrower - residential or commercial. If you cut the rate on a paying loan or eat some principal; if it is in distress, you have to call it a “troubled debt restructure” (TDR). Many regulators (and all the investment community) think these are akin to “non accruing” or “non performing” loans (”NPAs”). Banks loathe NPA’s - so if they do the right thing and cut a deal, they get saddled with a TDR which equals a NPA (in most places).

Why bother. Get it off the balance sheet. If another bank does the same loan fresh at the lower debt level, it is a perfectly OK performing loan. The government wants the banks to work with people then punish them when they do. It is crazyland out there.

29 posted on 10/24/2011 8:54:30 AM PDT by dan on the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson