But to interpret his answer as an answer to THAT interpretation of the question is absurd, because his answer didn’t match; he said “NO”. Why would he say “NO”, that he didn’t want his kid to raise the baby? Why would he say the government shouldn’t be involved, when the question was about what HE would want?
Not that it matters — Cain has explained how he interpreted the question, and what his answer was about, and it was about abortion, not adoption. Rather than believe their own candidate, some supporters have decided to attack other freepers who do.
A better question would be, "Why would a freeper attack Cain who has a 100% record in support of life and has stated unequivicolly that he does not support abortion at any time? and would halt funding to Planned Parenthood and appoing judges with a pro-life philosophy"
You will twist as hard as you can to find fault in a contextual response and ignore his record and clear cut statement of position. You behave like you are more interested in formulating his position that taking the clear cut evidence of it.