Posted on 10/23/2011 7:55:26 AM PDT by nuconvert
Muammar Qadhafi may have been captured alive in Sirte, but it wasn't long before his dead body was being paraded through the streets of Misrata, a town pulverized by Qadhafi loyalists. The United Nations is predictably demanding an investigation into his alleged summary execution by forces loyal to Libya's new government. The UN's outrage is misplaced, though. We should all be glad Qadhafi is dead.
International justice has become a multi-billion dollar industry in which trials last years and justice is seldom served. Serbian dictator Slobodan Milošević died in prison more than four years after his trial began. Liberian dictator Charles Taylor first appeared before the Special Court for Sierra Leone on April 3, 2006; there is still no verdict. While Western diplomats believe a trial provides catharsis and allows for a new beginning, the opposite is actually true: Trials infect open wounds and seldom promote healing. True reconciliation requires beginning with a clean slate. Before his own death and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's capture, Hume Horan, the State Department's most talented Arabist of the past 50 years, spoke of the importance of seeing Saddam dead rather than on trial. "So long as his pug marks can be seen in the morning around our campfire, Iraqis will not sleep soundly," Horan wrote in a November 2003 email, adding, "He must be killed… We can pooh-pooh the likelihood of his ever making a comeback. But just that simple word 'comeback' must bring on a fainting spell for the likes of Governor [Iskandar] Witwit [of Hillah], who saw his brother's head hacked off in front of him."
The international justice industry should back off. It is too infected with its own agenda. When Saddam was captured and put on trial, Human Rights Watch (HRW) refused to provide the Iraqi prosecutors with evidence it had gathered about chemical attacks on Kurds unless the Iraqis agreed to waive capital punishment. HRW might believe they are enlightened, but Iraqis simply saw them for what they were: armchair imperialists.
Perhaps the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights wants to investigate the circumstances of Qadhafi's death; bureaucrats always want to feel relevant, and tilting at windmills is a UN pastime. But the first question he should ask is if his expensive quest will enable reconciliation or hamper it, and whether justice is best served by Westerners in three-piece suits, or by the Libyans themselves who have put a definitive end to their 42-year nightmare.
Ironic is the fact that American "justice" also fits inside that statement.
BS, as a person who is completely opposed to the world court, you either have a rule of law are you do not. There are no special exceptions. The person are person that shot the man should be tried and hung, it is that simple. Just like they should have tried daffy and hung him.
I’m not a Libyan, and neither I presume, are you.
The point he’s making is that international/world courts should stay out of this...it’s a Libyan matter. If the Libayns decide to prosecute the man who shot Gaddafi or not, that’s their business.
I thought Obama took him down. If it had been similar circumstances with Bush in office, the left would.... Oh, never mind.
Maybe the UN should invesitagte Obama, since Bob Schiefer on FTN stated 3 times that Obama “got” Kadaffi.
I bet by the end of the week Obummer hisself will have said he did it!
On the other hand, if it becomes either national or international policy that it is OK to take out someone you determine is a so called 'bad guy' just because, what will be the international end result? Will the entire world be issued a 007 license to kill?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.