Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ken21

At the end of that debate...I’ve of the opinion that I wouldn’t want to see either in the White House. I think they both demonstrated that they ought to stay at the state level and be happy about that.

To be honest, it was wrong to allow all this debate business build up so early. We now all have very strong ideas about the candidates....and most aren’t exactly a 4-star or 3-star player.


7 posted on 10/22/2011 8:31:30 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

i’m not voting for romney if he is the candidate.

i did vote for the bushes against my wishes; i’ll not do that again.

yes, perry was disappointing.

i’m supporting cain.


17 posted on 10/22/2011 8:37:02 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
and most aren’t exactly a 4-star or 3-star player.

Which is nonsense. Based on the hyper negative knee jerk cynicism wrongly considered "smart" in the current media/political world, Reagan would of been considered a 1 star playeb by today's standards of arrogant, hyper negative, knee jerk ignorance.

All of these candidates, except Romney and Huntsman, would be a much better President then any of the people currently in DC.

19 posted on 10/22/2011 8:38:32 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson