The Constitution does NOT make a distinction between a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen” AT ALL.
Our Constitution doesn’t mention “native citizen” at all.
Of U.S. citizens our Constitution only mentions or envisions two categories, those that are born with natural allegiance to these United States and those who must be “naturalized” into that state of allegiance.
Article II:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
You are right that I typed it wrong. I meant to say a distinction between "citizen" and "natural born citizen."
Read Article II and you see them use both terms, making the distinction.
There is no way you can argue that "natural born citizen" isn't in the Constitution, nor that a distinction isn't made.