Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.”

Minor v Happersett says no such thing. As quoted above.

Upon advice of council, McCain is a natural born U.S. Citizen. Beyond a reasonable doubt.

Obama’s status is reasonably doubtable. And in my personal opinion, he is not a natural born U.S. Citizen.

45 posted on 10/20/2011 2:15:03 PM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: fireforeffect
It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.”

Citizen, yes. Natural Born Citizen, not so much.

49 posted on 10/20/2011 2:21:45 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson