Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I made a mistake and in my reply (the one you have failed to grasp) I restated what I meant.

But forget all that. Give me your definition of Natural Born Citizen. Then I’ll know if we have something to argue about.


174 posted on 10/21/2011 9:07:50 AM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Semper911
U.S. law should always be a reflection of our best understanding of natural law.

If someone is born a citizen under U.S. law, in recognition of the natural allegiance they have due to conditions of birth, they are a natural born citizen.

Of U.S. citizens, one is either a natural born citizen or one must be “naturalized” into that state of allegiance.

There is no third category.

Like most things people make up, they cannot seem to agree - that is why birthers tend to be all over the map as far as what this third category is.

179 posted on 10/21/2011 9:15:52 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson