No, my definitions really aren’t. But in the off chance I am wrong, please provide me proof of it instead of merely saying so. Here’s my proof for what I am claiming:
In the absence of clear language in the constitutional text itself or any mention in historical texts contemporaneous with the drafting of the document (e.g. Madison’s notes on the Convention) you refer to commonly held definitional sources like Black’s Law Dictionary which typically adopt the common law definition:
Natural born citizen- Black’s Law Dictionary defines it as “Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government”
Native born citizen- Black’s Law Dictionay defines it as “Born within the territorial jurisdiction of a country; Born of parents who convey rights of citizenship to their offspring, regardless of the place of birth.”
Seems quite clear to me that Natural requires only birth within the jurisdiction (US birth) while Native born requires birth to US citizens
The Supreme Court defined natural-born citizen as all persons born in the country to parents who were its citizens. Black’s Law Dictionary isn’t controlling here.