Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

Well, I disagree with Schiff on a couple points.

First, he implies that the 9% sales tax applies to almost all of a person’s spending. This is clearly wrong, since Cain’s 9% sales tax only applies to new goods. It excludes services like rent, utilities, professional services like dentist, doctor, haircut, insurance, etc. as well as previously owned cars and homes. That is 70% of spending, and the 9% sales tax will apply to only 30% of spending for low income people. The 9% sales tax means less than 3% of income going to the sales tax. Personally, I think this is a mistake. If the sales tax rate was 4% rather than 9%, but included services, it would raise more revenue and engender less evasion. (Then again, the amount of revenue that will come from Cain’s sales tax is only $300B/yr — not enough to justify opening the door to another tax for Congress to manipulate. If the Income Tax and Business Tax portions were each 10% instead of 9%, and the capital gains income and SS income and employer non-cash compensation were not excluded from income, they’d produce enough revenue that the sales tax would be unnecessary.)

Second, the “business tax” is not presented as a flat rate corporate income tax. It is not a tax on “income” but a tax on “business”. It is essentially a Gross Receipts tax — with deductions for purchases from other DOMESTIC businesses. I don’t see any attempt to hide the fact that payroll is not deductible and is therefor subject to the 9% tax rate. Unlike Schiff, I think this is a high point of the ‘9-9-9’ plan. It replaces a punishingly high tax rate on corporate profits and low rate payroll tax with a single low rate tax on profits, payroll, and ... imports. Yes, businesses cannot deduct their cost of goods sold if they were purchased from foreign suppliers. This is a backdoor 9% tariff without violating trade agreements. Tit for tat for the way other countries rebate their VAT back to their producers if they export to the USA.


11 posted on 10/19/2011 11:03:43 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789

thanks for the reasoned counter-points. I am trying to think through this stuff.


20 posted on 10/20/2011 4:31:17 AM PDT by Puddleglum ("Diary from a Wall Street Sit In!" http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/96154)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kellis91789
Cain’s 9% sales tax only applies to new goods.

How much money each month do you personally spend on used goods? I honestly can't think of much of anything I buy used, except perhaps for a used car or an existing home. I don't do Goodwill or Salvation Army stores. I would expect that most families do the same.

It excludes services like rent, utilities, professional services like dentist, doctor, haircut, insurance, etc. as well as previously owned cars and homes.

Says who? Cain's website lists no exceptions from the 9% sales tax, not even for used goods. Cain himself has mentioned the used goods exclusion, but to my knowledge has not included any of the other exceptions you mentioned. So it is more accurate to assume the tax will be applies to rent, utilities, and services.

That is 70% of spending, and the 9% sales tax will apply to only 30% of spending for low income people.

How did you come up with this? Next to housing the largest expense for most families is food, services, and other goods. Those will be taxed.

It is essentially a Gross Receipts tax — with deductions for purchases from other DOMESTIC businesses.

Yeah I've seen that on his website, too, and it makes zero sense. What it appears to say is that if my company makes widgets and grosses $1 billion dollars and makes a $100 million profit, but uses all imported goods in the manufacturing process, then my corporate taxes will be $90 million and not $9 million You are taxing my profits completely out of existence and will kill most of the corporations in the country. I don't see that happening.

23 posted on 10/20/2011 4:50:26 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kellis91789

I think this is a high point of the ‘9-9-9’ plan. It replaces a punishingly high tax rate on corporate profits and low rate payroll tax with a single low rate tax on profits, payroll, and ... imports. Yes, businesses cannot deduct their cost of goods sold if they were purchased from foreign suppliers. This is a backdoor 9% tariff without violating trade agreements. Tit for tat for the way other countries rebate their VAT back to their producers if they export to the USA.


Thank you for the helpful analysis.


38 posted on 10/20/2011 7:11:22 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson