in the Luntz group last night even the Perry people thought he was petty, mean spirited, argued about a non issue and didn’t look Presidential.. the majority of the Perry supporters in the group before last night’s debate are now for somebody else... the only one bleeding is Perry from punching himself in the mouth so many times...
Oh yeah, toupee dude on Hannity. That “focus group” of his was sad, just a long Romney 2012 ad. They said a few condescending words about Cain, but I only saw one member of that group that said they’d vote for him.
Stacked for Mittens.
Oh, what bunch of hooey. These so called debates run by liberal moderators are worthless. I am from TX and know Rick Perry for an excellent governor. He is not a good debater, but it is a different situation for speaking and not being attacked like he was the first 3 debates. Perry got the point across about Mitt and that is that he says one thing and does another.
I watched the Luntz group and was not at all impressed with their opinions. If this group thought ‘Perry was petty, mean-spirited, argued about a non issue, and didn’t look Presidential’, then they were wearing blinders or refused to admit that Romney is a flawed candidate. Exposing Romney’s lies about illegal immigrants and his original statement that Romneycare would work well for the country were, in my opinion, major accomplishments. To say the illegal immigrant issue was a non issue is pure folly, because Romney denied he had ever hired an illegal immigrant. He knew for over a year the lawn service was using illegals and he didn’t give a rip until he found out it would hurt him in the election...so he lied about it until forced to admit it last night. I find it extremely odd that many of Romney’s supporters want to overlook the fact he was/is deceitful. When Rick Santorum and Rick Perry exposed his comment in his book that Romneycare would work well for the country, he denied he had ever said that. Guess what?!! He did write it in his book and then took it out of the paper back issue. Maybe his deceitfulness doesn’t bother the Luntz group, but it bothers me.
I don’t think Romney or Perry distinguished themselves last night, but I did think Romney was the petty, mean-spirited one who kept interrupting and yelling over Santorum and Perry to, “Let me talk, let me talk.” What a disgusting display of arrogance that he thinks he should be allowed all the time to talk and others shouldn’t speak if he doesn’t want to hear what they are saying. Perhaps he really didn’t want anyone to understand what they were saying, and that’s why he was speaking over them and interrupting. I don’t blame Perry for not allowing him to filibuster and take over his (Perry’s) time!
I’m not sure if I will support Perry, but I will be fair and unbiased in accessing his record and performance. While he has not been overly impressive in the debates does not bother me. These debates aren’t going to decide who the nominee will be. Newt Gingrich is by far the most intellectual and best debater, but can he lead and will his past indiscretions hurt him? I’m not sure, and I will listen carefully to what he and the others have to say.
Just exactly what does “looking presidential mean?” Oh, like obama did during his campaign, and look what we got stuck with. People are so danged superficial. To base one’s ability to govern based on whether or not one looks presidential - is immature.
Did I read that PPP poll from Texas correctly? Did Perry only pull 5 percent in that poll?
He’s dead Jim. Time to move along and fall in line behind Cain or Newt.