What’s with the (No mention of Cain) in the title, when the article mentions Gain?
Yes, they mentioned him several paragraphs down, and dismissed him from any serious consideration for the nomination, despite the fact that his tax plan was a central focus of the debate, and ignoring his lead in most of the polls.
In the first sentence of the article, the authors have decided it’s a two-man race. The others, including Cain, are “sideshow candidates”.