So you libel Dilataunt, what, are you in 6th grade? You realizes that violates the TOS of FR, yes?
***Let’s see. I libel him by calling him ‘Dilataunt’ but then you do the same thing. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
So, having nothing
***Well, I’ve tried all kinds of things to shoo away these useless flying rats, so the seagull insult seemed to be the next thing to try. It doesn’t work all that well, because they still seagull on the threads and “do their business” but at least now other FReepers can see how useless they are.
you’ve resorted to insults,
***Only after beint the recipient of them, time and again, just like you did by calling me a twit. Does that mean that you had nothing, so you dove into YOUR sixth grade bag o’ tricks and started slinging the big ‘TWIT’ word around?
too bad your parents took you out of school in 6th grade.
***What an interesting presumption. If you would like to talk about education policy, by all means please click on the keyword I maintain: CHSPE
I barely bother skimming your ‘post’s
***Hey, Mr. Superior Writer, what is this [’post’s] thing? Is it somehow super-duper-significant?
as it’s typically arecndjhfjkrahfjkweaf, SEAGULL, jfcikewjfbkre s, SEAGULL, hgekjwal hrgjkwalsfbdsbjfk.
Then you post that lame graphic.
***I like the graphics. Graphics are fun.
Looks, it’s nothing to be ashamed that you can’t read or write at an adult level,
***Now that there is funny, no matter who ya are, I tellya. Now LOOKS, if ya’s tryin’ to be Superiors in yer writin’, ya need to watch out for all dem typos & piss-poor grammer & such.
there are plenty of classes that will help you in your home town; you should look into them.
***Gee, that’s the exact same insult I used on you. Aintcha got nuthin more ‘riginal than deerecktly copying the guy you’s been insultin’?
***Gee, that’s the exact same insult I used on you. Aintcha got nuthin more ‘riginal than deerecktly copying the guy you’s been insultin’?
Yes, that is Shakespeare level writing, no one else could come up with anything close to it.
You have yet to address the fact that that Nobel prize winner did not say he was testing Rossi's device. Let me report it as I'm sure it's got both of your functioning neurons in a loop
UPDATE: Brian Josephson (Noble Prize winning physicist) will NOT test Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalyzer. A misinterpreted posting led to this misunderstanding.
UPDATE: "Someone who couldn't read failed to see that the text talking about 'our test' was written by Levi not me. It is Levi's test." - Brian Josephson
Yes, he's so busy he's missing out on possible Nobel work.
So, who is putting words into whose mouth and answer this question, was it a fraud or a mere misunderstanding?