Yeah...
Part of the problem is I think he saw it as being “fair” to Netanyahu, as well.
And then conversely, you make a great point, nopardons.
I think some of what you are expressing is the idea of the candidates talking specifically about the policies of the Obama administration and telling us what they would do differently. You want to hear the candidates say, “Look, I disagree with Obama on Libya. Obama was wrong. If I was president, this is what I would have done.”
In other words, you want someone to vote FOR, and not just vote AGAINST Obama. Otherwise, it wouldn’t matter who you voted for, would it?
You’re absolutely right.
Cain's very major problem is that he doesn't keep up with what's in the news and isn't prepared for many of the questions he gets in debates and interviews.
I want these people to talk about Obama and what they would have done/do that would be better! None of them, not even Newt, present such options. Sure they all have "talking points", that's the norm, but that doesn't help voters make educated decisions on who to vote FOR and I do want to vote FOR someone, rather than having to hold my nose.
And yes, Obama IS beatable; it just isn't going to be as "easy" to beat him as some claim.