Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Def Conservative; All
It is *NOT* a VAT. Having _a_ supposedly defining feature of a VAT does not make it a VAT.

This is something Cain explained in an op-ed yesterday.

9-9-9 has no VAT. There's a retail sales tax on new item purchases only that consumers pay.

American business-to-business sales are deductible from the business income flat tax as are capital investments like machinery purchases.

Anyone claiming there's a VAT are scaremongers.

As anyone can see there's no supply-chain consumption tax in 9-9-9 and that's what a VAT is.

33 posted on 10/18/2011 4:28:59 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
The critics of Cain's plan seem desperate to label some part of it a VAT.

First they were calling the retail sales tax portion a VAT. That died down when people started educating themselves on what a VAT actually was.

Now their trying to call the 9% corporate income tax a VAT. I think that will die down when people start to compare it to the current 35% corporate income tax.

After all, if you're going to call Cain's 9% corporate income tax a VAT, what do you call the current 35% corporate income tax?

There isn't a VAT in the plan, and saying the 9% corporate income tax works like a VAT is not a valid criticism. Heck, I pointed out a while back that the current 35% corporate income tax works like a VAT, but for some reason you don't hear Michele Bachmann screaming about that.

The hidden 22% tax

47 posted on 10/19/2011 6:58:24 AM PDT by Brookhaven (I oppose an electric border fence, because it might kill the alligators in the moat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
The critics of Cain's plan seem desperate to label some part of it a VAT.

First they were calling the retail sales tax portion a VAT. That died down when people started educating themselves on what a VAT actually was.

Now their trying to call the 9% corporate income tax a VAT. I think that will die down when people start to compare it to the current 35% corporate income tax.

After all, if you're going to call Cain's 9% corporate income tax a VAT, what do you call the current 35% corporate income tax?

There isn't a VAT in the plan, and saying the 9% corporate income tax works like a VAT is not a valid criticism. Heck, I pointed out a while back that the current 35% corporate income tax works like a VAT, but for some reason you don't hear Michele Bachmann screaming about that.

48 posted on 10/19/2011 7:08:13 AM PDT by Brookhaven (I oppose an electric border fence, because it might kill the alligators in the moat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson