Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: martosko

We don’t know if they are a danger to themselves or others. At this point all we know is the Vet is unable to handle personal affairs.

I would not deny them the right to own a gun UNTIL they were tested and deemed unfit to own a gun,
BUT i would have them tested before they could get a gun.
if you are not cognizent enough to handle your personal affairs maybe you are also not cognizent enough to safely own a gun
. They at least deserve the right some sort of screening process


5 posted on 10/18/2011 2:14:38 PM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

“BUT i would have them tested before they could get a gun.
if you are not cognizent enough to handle your personal affairs maybe you are also not cognizent enough to safely own a gun
. They at least deserve the right some sort of screening process”

Who died and made you the Constitutional gate keeper?
The VA’s method of determining if a vet is able to handle his/her own affairs is dubious at best. They refuse to list the criteria they are using to determine such a finding.


7 posted on 10/18/2011 3:02:40 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson