Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

The point is that the payroll tax results in an employee taking home 15% less money than he otherwise could were it not for the tax.


67 posted on 10/17/2011 3:13:42 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Greyhound
The point is that the payroll tax results in an employee taking home 15% less money than he otherwise could were it not for the tax.

The other way to see it is that the employer pays out 15% than he knows the employee will accept for his work (i.e. his net pay). If the employer suddenly doesn't have to pay this, it's gravy, and you're assuming that he'll see it in his best interest to pass that gravy on to the employee rather than apply it to his bottom line and benefit his shareholders. I think, based on my interactions with the real world, that this is delusional.

90 posted on 10/17/2011 3:57:42 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson