Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

Exactly, if the fetus is the equivalent of a mole, wart, or cyst, than the gov has no business restricting a woman’s right to choose to remove it.


24 posted on 10/17/2011 10:24:37 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: HerrBlucher

The gestating child builds all of his or her own tissues/body. The mother’s body is protection and sustenance source and makes none of the amniotic sac nor the body of the child.


26 posted on 10/17/2011 10:28:22 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: HerrBlucher

Which, BTW, is a great argument to use against a pro-choice candidate who talks about wanting to make abortion “rare”. If they don’t think abortion is murder, why do they think we should talk women out of it? We wouldn’t try to make removing moles “rare”. If Abortion is just removing unwanted tissue, and it is so safe we can do it in clinics, and so easy we can do it for $300, why would we ever want to spend money to make it “rare”?

The only reason they want to make it “rare” is because, deep down, they KNOW they are killing people, and it pains them, and they want it to stop, even though they like their jobs and they like the support of the abortion lobby. Like good Germans who knew they should oppose the gassing of jews, but they really thought Germany was going to be good for them and didn’t want to upset things.


36 posted on 10/17/2011 11:21:21 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson